« Dropout Factories: Is High School Reform A Sleeper Issue?The Bristol Stomp »

    Swift & Change Able Cartoon #4

    11/02/07

    Permalink 10:43:22 am, Categories: Announcements [A]

    Andrew Hart is a freelance artist and co-founder of the Philadelphia Cartoonist Society.To see more of his artwork, visit his website www.andre-whart.comThis cartoon appears exclusively at Swift & Change Able.All rights reserved to Andrew Hart.

    Background: See, for example, this link from the Center for Responsive Politics as a starting point: link.Note that a wide variety of members from both parties receive PAC money. The question is: how does this affect their votes?One way to investigate this would be to monitor how closely donations match sponsorship of bills endorsed by such PACs, for example see Democrats for Education Reform: "link to "NEA To Congress: Comply or Perish".You’re gonna have to dig around to get the full story. That’s democracy in the age of transparency. We’ll just tell you there’s a lot of gray - some members vote according to the money, and some don’t. Some days and some issues are different than others. Good luck, have fun, and let us know if you have any insights. We’ll print them right here. Thanks.

    Trackback address for this post

    Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

    4 comments

    Comment from: philipkovacs [Visitor] Email · http://www.educatorroundtable.org
    I realize i'm a little slower than you DC policy insiders, but are you suggesting that it is the freshmen who are being led around by corporate leaders? I've looked at Miller's contributions, and what strikes me are the number of out of state contributors who work for companies who make tests.

    Be a big man and publish this comment won't you?
    11/02/07 @ 11:42
    Comment from: bigswifty [Member] Email · http://www.swiftandchangeable.org
    I'm suggesting that some members of Congress do as they're told and don't stray very far from what their funders tell them to do. I emphasize "some". Some do, some don't. Freshmen who won by small margins feel particularly vulnerable. The NEA has been bragging on Capitol Hill that they are responsible for helping the Dems take back the House and that in turn House Freshmen are indebted to them. One need only look at the NEA's site to see that Miller has not followed the urging of the NEA/AFT PAC, nor have many other members with more experience and safer seats. That's politics, dude. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I just think that there's a way to listen to teachers AND parents AND students AND researchers etc. Fair and balanced, as they say.

    Note that the Student and Parents for High Quality Public Education PAC has yet to be formed.

    Take a look for yourself at the FEC filings and the public statements of key House members on the issue of education. There's a lot of gray. The world isn't as black and white as you seem to think.
    11/02/07 @ 12:52
    Comment from: philipkovacs [Visitor] Email · http://www.educatorroundtable.org
    Thanks for posting the comment. And I appreciate you "duding" me...we're fast becoming friends.

    The NEA has been bragging? Really? About what? About being as useful as mud? About charging membership outrageous fees and using that money to perpetuate misery?

    What, exactly, has the NEA done in the last 15 (20?) years that makes the organization particularly worthwhile?

    What has the national union done for teachers? For children?

    The NEA did nothing to help the dems take back the house.

    And it's the NEA's willingness to roll over and expose its belly that is partly responsible for the mess we are in now. If the NEA was worth half of its dues we'd be much closer to a responsive, customized, integrative system of education that helps children maximize their individual strengths rather than a standardizing system that transforms children into numbers and "learning" into drudgery.

    End of rant.

    Thanks for the space, man...
    11/03/07 @ 08:31
    Comment from: John Thompson [Visitor] Email
    I agree with Philip but I haven't gotten a "dude" or gotten a post published.

    I wish the AFT could take the NEA approach, but I understand why it can't. I can't understand what is supposed to be the value of berating the NEA. Many of the schools served by the NEA get only one thing out of NCLB, some tools that allow them to better serve their poorer populations.

    I'd like to move beyond a NEA/AFT merger. The best thing we could do for kids would be to merge the teachers unions with the principals unions. Give us all a little buffer, and we can move with the confidence needed to tackle the problem.
    11/03/07 @ 13:44

    This post has 16 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

    Leave a comment


    Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

    Your URL will be displayed.
    (Line breaks become <br />)
    (Name, email & website)
    (Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
    February 2010
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28            

    Swift & Change Able will attempt to cover all aspects of education policy, including:
    * Legislation
    * Policy
    * Politics

    Swift & Change Able will try to look at events in the states and local school districts, as well as the ongoing ESEA reauthorization process in Washington, D.C.

    Content on Swift & Change Able will include:
    * Analysis
    * Commentary
    * Research
    * Data
    * Public Forums

    and, sometimes, some surprises just to liven things up.

    Search

    The requested Blog doesn't exist any more!

    XML Feeds

    powered by b2evolution free blog software