« Catholic Schools and Federally Funded Private School VouchersThe Future Of Schooling »

    Nebraska Goes Against The Grain

    04/09/08

    Permalink 07:41:37 am, Categories: Announcements [A]
    On Monday, Nebraska took an important step toward a statewide assessment and accountability system.

    A little known provision in federal law allows two states - Iowa and Nebraska - an exemption from using the same assessments to measure the academic progress of all children. But that is about to change.

    According to the Nebraska Herald:

    "The [Nebraska State] Legislature voted 33-15 to give Legislative Bill 1157 its final approval. That sends the bill to Gov. Dave Heineman with enough support to override any veto.

    "The vote sets the stage for Nebraska to end a testing system that differs from school district to school district. Critics say that system keeps schools from being fully accountable to the public because a school district can be accurately compared only to itself.

    //

    "B 1157 won broad support among urban senators from Omaha and Lincoln and senators from Nebraska’s immigration centers, such as Grand Island and Schuyler. The entire Education Committee also voted in support." 

    Some education activists, most notably Linda Darling-Hammond of Stanford, are lobbying to have the rest of the nation go back to where Nebraska was on Sunday, to a patchwork system of local assessments.
     
    Dr. Darling-Hammond has done some great work in the field of education (the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future report of 1996) but her position on local assessments is, frankly, laughable hard to understand from a psychometric and public policy standpoint.

    But don’t take my word for it. The National Academy of Sciences studied this issue several years ago. And here’s their unequivocal conclusion:

    "Can scores on one test be made interpretable in terms of scores on other tests? Can we have more uniform data about student performance from our healthy hodgepodge of state and local programs?”

    “After deliberation that lasted nine months, involving intensive review of the technical literature and consideration of every possible methodological nuance, the committee’s answer was a blunt ‘no.’”[1] 

    Sandy Kress (personal communication) gets the kicker quote on Nebraska’s politically bold move:

    "It’s nice to have Nebraska join the rest of the world. It’s good news for poor Hispanic and African-American kids."


    [1] Micheal Feuer, Executive Director of the Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academies of Sciences, in “Moderating the Debate,” Harvard Education Press, 2006.


    Trackback address for this post

    Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

    Feedback awaiting moderation

    This post has 454 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

    Leave a comment


    Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

    Your URL will be displayed.
    (Line breaks become <br />)
    (Name, email & website)
    (Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
    September 2010
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     << <   > >>
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30    

    Swift & Change Able will attempt to cover all aspects of education policy, including:
    * Legislation
    * Policy
    * Politics

    Swift & Change Able will try to look at events in the states and local school districts, as well as the ongoing ESEA reauthorization process in Washington, D.C.

    Content on Swift & Change Able will include:
    * Analysis
    * Commentary
    * Research
    * Data
    * Public Forums

    and, sometimes, some surprises just to liven things up.

    Search

    The requested Blog doesn't exist any more!

    XML Feeds

    powered by b2evolution free blog software