« Foul BallSwift & Change Able Cartoon #9 »

    Don't Kid Yourself

    07/01/08

    Permalink 04:42:00 am, Categories: Announcements [A]
    In today’s Science Times, John Tierney (the New York Times writer, not the able Congressman from Massachusetts) turns in yet another insightful piece on social psychology, politics, and policy.

    We’ve touched on such themes previously here at Swift & Change Able with regard to education reform in general and NCLB in particular (see, for example "The Psychology of Social Change: Don’t Believe the Hype"  and "NCLB Cognitive Dissonance").

    Today Tierney tackles team mentality and how it blinds our judgment with regard to the merit of others’ arguments and actions, and our own. Here’s an experiment, as summarized by Tierney:

    A double standard of morality also emerged when other people were arbitrarily divided in two groups and given differently colored wristbands. They watched as one person, either from their group or from the other group, went through the exercise and assigned himself the easy job. Even though the observers had no personal stake in the outcome — they knew they would not be stuck with the boring job — they were still biased.

    On average, they judged it to be unfair for someone in the other group to give himself the easy job, but they considered it fair when someone in their own group did the same thing. 

    If a colored wristband is enough to skew your moral judgment, imagine how you are affected by the “D” or the “R” label on your voting registration.  

    One could quibble with some of Tierney’s terms. And the NYT graphics. But we see the dynamics of what he is talking about all the time in education policy.
    • People who staunchly supported school desegregation vigorously oppose public school choice.
    • Activists who rally in the abstract for better "child care" want an outright repeal of NCLB’s supplemental educational services provisions.
    • Long-time supporters of data disaggregation assert that NCLB has done nothing to improve state accountability systems.
    Is there hope for change? Of course.

    “Hypocrisy is driven by mental processes over which we have volitional control,” said Dr. Valdesolo, a psychologist at Amherst College. “Our gut seems to be equally sensitive to our own and others’ transgressions, suggesting that we just need to find ways to better translate our moral feelings into moral actions.”

    We are fortunate to have two candidates for President who, whatever their inconsistencies may be, have in the past taken positions that went against the prevailing grains of their respective political parties. And we will have new leadership next year at the two national teachers unions. The timing for a national gut check on our positions regarding education reform couldn’t be better.

    There is nothing wrong with partisanship. It has its time and place. But neither party has a monopoly on truth. And when it comes to volitional control over our mental processes, can we ever get enough?

    Trackback address for this post

    Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

    2 comments

    Comment from: Gary Orfield [Visitor]
    I have no idea where you got the impression that the Civil Rights Project hates tutoring. In fact, we identified one-to-one tutoring by teachers as one of the most promising ways to increase the impact of Title I in our study HARD WORK FOR GOOD SCHOOLS, which was based on expert reports before NCLB was ever enacted. Researchers, however, have found little or no evidence of the value of the NCLB SES vouchers for tutoring that is often not good, not individualized and not related to the school's goals and curriculum. Good tutoring is invaluable.

    G.O., Co-Director, Civil Rights Project
    07/11/08 @ 21:12
    Comment from: Charlie [Member] Email · http://www.swiftandchangeable.org
    Gary - Thanks for writing,

    My understanding (based on the Project's report of last year and Gail Sunderman's public comments) is that the Project wants the SES program terminated, even though there are good programs funded through SES.

    SES is not a voucher program. SES is merely a funding stream.

    It's nice to hear from you. I apologize for the delay in publishing your comment.
    07/22/08 @ 04:58

    This post has 489 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

    Leave a comment


    Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

    Your URL will be displayed.
    (Line breaks become <br />)
    (Name, email & website)
    (Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
    September 2010
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     << <   > >>
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30    

    Swift & Change Able will attempt to cover all aspects of education policy, including:
    * Legislation
    * Policy
    * Politics

    Swift & Change Able will try to look at events in the states and local school districts, as well as the ongoing ESEA reauthorization process in Washington, D.C.

    Content on Swift & Change Able will include:
    * Analysis
    * Commentary
    * Research
    * Data
    * Public Forums

    and, sometimes, some surprises just to liven things up.

    Search

    The requested Blog doesn't exist any more!

    XML Feeds

    powered by b2evolution free blog software